Return to Home Page

Fundamental Design
Terminology and Concepts
    Introduction
    Design Characteristic
    Design Principle
    Design Paradigm
    Design Pattern
    Design Pattern Language
    Design Standard
    Best Practice

Elements of
Service-Oriented Computing
    Introduction
    Service-Oriented
Architecture (SOA)
    Services and
Service-Orientation
    Service Compositions
    Service Inventory
    A Conceptual View of
Service-Oriented Computing
    A Physical View of
Service-Oriented Computing

Goals and Benefits of
Service-Oriented Computing
    Introduction
    Increased Intrinsic Interoperability
    Increased Federation
    Increased Vendor Diversification Options
    Increased Business and Technology Domain Alignment
    Increased ROI
    Increased
Organizational Agility
    Reduced IT Burden

Service-Oriented Computing
in the Real World
    Services as Web Services
    About Web Services (Part I)
    About Web Services (Part II)
    Service Models and
Service Layers
    Service Inventory Blueprints
    Service-Oriented Analysis
    Service-Oriented Design

Additional Resources
    SOA Sites
    SOA Book Series
    SOA Training & Certification
    Free SOA Principles Poster
    Notification


Goals and Benefits of Service-Oriented Computing

Increased Vendor Diversification Options

Vendor diversification refers to the ability an organization has to pick and choose “best-of-breed” vendor products and technology innovations and use them together within one enterprise. It is not necessarily beneficial for an organization to have a vendor diverse environment; however, it is beneficial to have the option to diversify when required. To have and retain this option requires that its technology architecture not be tied or locked into any one specific vendor platform.

This represents an important state for an enterprise in that it provides the constant freedom for an organization to change, extend, and even replace solution implementations and technology resources without disrupting the overall, federated service architecture. This measure of governance autonomy is attractive because it prolongs the lifespan and increases the financial return of automation solutions.

By designing a service-oriented architecture in alignment with but neutral to major vendor SOA platforms and by positioning service contracts as standardized endpoints throughout a federated enterprise, proprietary service implementation details can be abstracted to establish a consistent inter-service communications framework. This provides organizations with constant options by allowing them diversify their enterprise as needed.


Figure: A service composition consisting of three services, each of which encapsulates a different vendor automation environment. If service-orientation is adequately applied to the services, underlying disparity will not inhibit their ability to be combined into effective compositions.

Vendor diversification is further supported by taking advantage of the standards-based, vendor-neutral Web services framework. Because they impose no proprietary communication requirements, Web services further decrease dependency on vendor platforms. As with any other implementation medium, though, Web services need to be shaped and standardized through service-orientation in order to become a federated part of an SOA.

This page contains excerpts from:

SOA: Principles of Service Design
by Thomas Erl

ISBN: 0132344823, Prentice Hall/PearsonPTR, Hardcover
240+ Full Color Illustrations, 573 pages

Download the free Color SOA Principles Poster at www.soaposters.com.
For more information about this book, visit
www.soabooks.com.
The Prentice Hall Service-Oriented Computing Series from Thomas Erl
Home    SOA Books    SOA Magazine    SOA School    SOA Principles    SOA Patterns    SOA Methodology    SOA Glossary    SOA Specs    Legal
Copyright © 2007-2008 SOA Systems Inc.